Messenger In our series, Guide to the classicsexperts explain key works of literature. Already, inthe American poet T. Eliot thought the book was Zeitgeist-y enough to provide the epigraph for his epoch-defining poem, The Waste Land - although another American poet, Ezra Pound, talked him out of using it.
The Protocols of Joly Anyone who starts looking into the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion will frequently encounter the old chestnut about a "hoax" or a "forgery".
When Philip Graves made the allegation inlong before the days of the internet and all the pages detailing the various logical fallacies, his target audience had never heard of a circular argument or a non sequitur.
Debunking Graves is as easy as falling off a log. Proponents of the "forgery" theory have an argument that runs like this: The forgery theorists will frequently not even bother to include part 2. By going from their premise 1 directly to their conclusion 3their argument becomes a non sequitur.
The conclusion does not follow from the premise.
In order to get from 1 to 3they must include other postulates such as 2. Although premise 1 is truepremise 2 and conclusion 3 are both false. Clearly, the hypothetical "anti-Semites", alleged by Jews to have authored the Protocols with the help of a bit of plagiarism, do not have a monopoly on copying other people's work.
Jewish supremacists who were plotting world conquest had more motives for plagiarism than the alleged "anti-Semites". Both would have saved time and effort. Jewish supremacists also had a powerful motive in that if the Protocols was discovered, they would be able to blame "anti-Semites", citing the "forgery" charge as their 'proof'.
Ultimately, as we shall see, the decision to have the Protocols writers deliberately copy previous works in such a way that a number of parallel passages were strikingly obvious was taken by Alphonse de Rothschild.
His inspiration for this contingency plan, of crying "forgery" in the event of discovery, can be traced to the fact that aroundat the time of his Protocols project, he discovered that merchants from countries such as Russia were bottling cheap wine and selling it with "Lafite Rothschild" labels on the bottles.
Thus, with the pirates forging Rothschild's labels, the concept of forgery would have been playing on his mind. And whatever his views were on Russians, the experience would hardly have changed them for the better!
When the Protocols Deniers put up their non sequitur argument and don't explicitly state 2they are aware that many of their dupes will implicitly assume 2given how the mainstream media has conditioned many people to perceive Jews - and "anti-Semites".
Alternatively, if they do include 2they have inserted a false postulate, and thus their argument is circular. They have started out with their desired conclusion, and have set up a false proposition in order to obtain their conclusion.
Philip Graves states four "conclusions" as his 'evidence' of "forgery": As shown above, that is not evidence of forgery. Moreover, Graves is forced to concede that "there is no evidence as to how the Geneva Dialogues reached Russia", which is consistent with the Protocols originating somewhere other than Russia.
How odd that when the Russians are supposed to be "forging" a document, instead of Russians in Russia writing it in Russian, it is supposed to be Russians in Paris writing it in French, according to the "forgery" proponents' own conspiracy theory! The Protocols "served as a weapon against the Russian Liberals".
Again, this is not evidence of forgery, since the Protocols would have served as a political "weapon" irrespective of who authored them. In order for "forged" Protocols to be as useful to the Russian conservatives as the genuine article, the forger would need to do an excellent job - and forgery proponents contend that the easily spotted parallel passages occurred as a result of a "rush job", as opposed to a deliberate planting of 'evidence' that was intended to be so obvious that it could hardly be missed in the event of the Protocols' discovery.
However, Jewish supremacists would be aware that the work might be discovered, and would plan accordingly. They would have a powerful motive to do a hasty job of paraphrasing, so that the plagiarism would detected within two or three decades, would be more evident upon discovery, and "anti-Semites" could be blamed for the "forgery".
Any hypothetical "anti-Semites" would have more motive to do a good job, so that their "fraud" might remain undetected and the Protocols would continue to serve a political purpose. Where the Protocols are not derived from the Geneva Dialogues, they "were probably supplied by the Okhrana" the Russian secret police.
This is simply wishful thinking and baseless speculation on the part of Graves.
As we shall see, the Okhrana's archives were saved, shipped to the US, and opened inand there was zero evidence of a plot to forge the Protocols.
Moreover, there is ample evidence that the Okhrana did not create the Protocols. Amusingly, the former French Chief Rabbi Gilles Bernheim, an Ashkenazi Jew, was recently exposed as a plagiarist who lied about his credentials.
This claim soon fell apart, and then Bernheim tried to blame a research assistant. But it gets even better - Bernheim was found to have plagiarised several other people, including Elie Wiesel!
And then it turned out that Bernheim was not the intellectual that he purported to be; he claimed to have a doctorate in philosophy, but had never finished his degree. In February he rammed his car into the back of his neighbor's carrather than wait a minute for the neighbor to finish chatting to his girlfriend and move out of the way, and later appeared at the neighbor's front door waving a kitchen knife.
A little later at the age of 19, LaBeouf went to a neighbor's apartment with a knife to confront him for insulting his mother, taking a friend for backup.Vol. XVIII. Salt Lake City, Utah, Sunday, January 4, No. A LYING CHARGE REFUTED.
_____ Among the false teachings of the Mormon press and pulpit to their deluded followers is the oppression visited upon them by the American Government. “exterminate all the brutes” Sven Lindqvist’s “Exterminate all the Brutes” explores the idea that genocides have been deeply rooted in European thinking over the last century.
It is written in the form of a travel dairy and a historical examination of European racism over the past two centuries. Heart of Darkness centers around Marlow, an introspective sailor, and his journey up the Congo River to meet Kurtz, reputed to be an idealistic man of great abilities.
Marlow takes a job as a riverboat captain with the Company, a Belgian concern organized to trade in the Congo.
As he travels to. Amazon lumps different translations together as merely variations on how the book is delivered. In this case, the Hays translation is the hardcover, while the authors who translated the paperback and Kindle versions aren't specified.
In EXTERMINATE ALL THE BRUTES, Sven Lindqvist presents a haunting mixture of travelogue, literary interpretation, and historical analysis, the purpose of which is to expose the roots of twentieth.
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT IS THE SOLUTION!! Alex Jones looks through the Eye of Sauron, the father of lies, - news from the great lying satanic media empires - and thus, guided by the enemy all .