They had money problems. They spent all there money on the war and were very poor.
Wynne is offering solutions to health care problems her government created Opinion Wynne is offering solutions to health care problems her government created Three years ago, her government cut residency spots.
Now she's promising cash for new ones Three years ago, her government cut residency spots. May 14, 4: May 14 Our increasing shortages in primary care, along with unacceptable wait times for specialist care, will surely come to characterize this government's legacy.
So it has been under her tenure that I have spent the last four years as a frontline physician trainee, witnessing firsthand the dysfunction with which health care delivery operates in this province.
The majority of our challenges are due to a combination of government inaction and a willful go-it-alone philosophy.
This could not have been worse for patient care. Our increasing shortages in primary care, along with unacceptable wait times for specialist care, will surely come to characterize this government's legacy.
And as Ontario's population grows in size and age, our health care utilization, by definition, will swell. This means more patients using our health care system with increasing frequency.
Ontario cuts 50 medical residency places, critics warn of doctor shortage However, not only has the provincial government appeared unconcerned with this issue until now, it has actually made things worse. Three years ago, for example, it made the baffling decision to cut the number of residency spots in the province, thereby reducing the number of newly trained physicians.
There have also been deleterious changes to the delivery structure of primary care under Wynne. This includes barring new family doctors from entering capitation models such as family health teams and family health organizations except in certain rural communitiesthereby eliminating incentives for these graduates to start new practices.
These decisions have helped contribute to the fact thatOntarians now find themselves without a family doctor. That means many of them access costly medical services through emergency rooms, which only adds to chronic hospital overcapacity, known as code gridlock.
The government is also responsible for creating labyrinthine bureaucracies that have made a mess of home and long-term care. At last count, there were more health care bureaucrats than family doctors in Ontario. Cleaning up mistakes Now that the provincial election is underway, the Wynne government has promised to fix all of this.
It has, for example, recently announced funding for 53 new medical residency spots — a solution to a problem that they themselves created. This seems to be its modus operandi. In response to these and other conditions, physicians across the province sprung into action: While that might be the norm, it shouldn't have to be.
No party has yet to articulate a clear, comprehensive and effective strategy to fix health care. And they all shoulder the blame for the implementation of myopic strategies during their respective governments. Of course, in the spirit of buying votes, all have now pledged more funding dollars, which is, at the very least, the bare minimum required.
What is not being offered to voters is a fresh, new take on health care reform. Advisers to current and previous governments continue to dictate worn health care policy, despite decades of poor performance, devoid of innovative and diverse thought.taxes violated their rights as British citizens.
The colonists started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods. In some colonists in Boston, Massachusetts demonstrated their frustration by dressing up like Indians, sneaking onto ships in the harbor, and dumping imported tea into the water.
This was called the Boston Tea Party. Mar 14, · Best Answer: War is expensive, even in the 18th Century. The money expended worldwide by Britain in the war had nearly bled the folks at home white.
Since the initial conflict had been on the Virginia frontier, and there was a signed document stating that a Major Washington had murdered an innocent French Status: Resolved. A New Government Arthur Szyk, The Arthur Szyk Society, Burlingame, CA Washington and His Times, The Struggle on Concord Bridge (), Paris..
After the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, the thirteen American colonies needed a government to replace the British system they were attempting to . What problems did the british government face after the seven years' war (both at home and in the colonies), and what solutions did it propose, specifically relating to the colonies?
how reasonable were parliament's solutions, and in what ways did the colonists view them as an attack on their liberty? 4.
Look at Source 2a, b and c. Having been the largest slaving nation, Britain became a determined abolitionist power after , using the Royal Navy to stop ships suspected of being slavers. Why did the British Parliament pass the Navigation Acts?
Because they did not want to compete with any other country since Britain was the only country trading with the colonies; they could charge whatever they wanted for any item.